Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
SharePoint

Midterm Practicum Student Evaluation (For SUPERVISORS)

Date 10/22/2011
Supervisor's Name Chris Lempa
Community Organization (practicum site) Lawrence-Douglas County Housing Authority
Student's Name Marieka Jones
We appreciate your frank and honest responses to the following student evaluation.  Your feedback assists the course instructors with the education and future placement of practicum students.  This information is also useful for the professional development of the students.

Please indicate whether you consent to our sharing of your evaluation responses with the practicum student whom you supervise.		 Yes, I consent to the sharing of my responses with the student
Student's commitment to the practicum experience: Usually Committed (3 Points)
(1) Comments:
Chris and I, Carrie Lindsey are filling out the survey together. 
Student's work habits to date: Somewhat Inconsistent (3 Points)
(2) Comments:
There was a miscommunication on schedule during fall break but student has been consistent since that time.
Overall quality of student's effort (e.g., amount learned, skills learned, etc.): Satisfied (4 Points)
(3) Comments:
Clarifications of expections have been made.
Progress toward practicum product(s)/project from the student: Satisfied (12 Points)
(4) Comments:
The project is behind according to the initially set timeline but student has a few more parent surveys to obtain but has completed the majority of the first part of the project.
Student's interaction with others at the site (e.g. staff, clients): Almost Always (4 Points)
(5) Comments:
 
Student's relationship with others in the organization: (e.g.  effective working relationships within the organization and the community.) Satisfied (4 Points)
(6) Comments:
 
Student's overall attitude toward the activities and personnel associated with the practicum: Fairly Positive (4 Points)
(7) Comments:
 
Student's understanding of practicum objectives: Occasionally Insufficient (3 Points)
(8) Comments:
The objective of the practicum project was clarified and I have discussed my expectations with Marieka on turning in "drafts" that are more complete, particularly in formatting and spelling so that actual verbiage content can be easily added.  Marieka is learning that, in the workplace, it is better to ask questions in order to keep from redoing work.  An example of this would be when I sent her a document that she couldn't open, she continued to rework an old one.  If she had only said that she couldn't open the document she would have saved time and herself from redoing work I had already completed. 
Student's level of dependability to date: Almost Always Dependable (3 points)
(9) Comments:
 
Would you be willing to host this practicum student for an additional semester? Note: This information will not be shared with the student. No
(10) Comments:
My choice in this might be different if Marieka is able to do at least part of the practicum in the morning rather than the afternoon which is a difficult time for staff, who are running an "after" school program for youth, to engage a student who requires more direction.
As compared to other interns and practicum students that you have hosted in the past (from any institution), how would you rate the professional performance of your current practicum student? 3. Average
(11) Comments:
 
Please enter any additional feedback.
Marieka is working on a project that is important and will be beneficial to both staff and tenants as we try to gage what is working with our own program as well as what it takes for parents who recieve housing assistance to become engaged in the activities and education of their children.  I hope that Marieka is getting a "workplace" experience that will be helpful to her in the future after she graduates. 


This site is a service of the KU Center for Community Health and Development.